[2017/02/14 06:22]Wolfgang#7: I had a litte thoughtAlt#35: yes?Wolfgang#7: I know it is precipited and maybe little sily, and i m not very much in symbolsWolfgang#7: and i don't know if you ll wishWolfgang#7: but in case you d wish, and thought it was nice to do, although the complication when we don't use the coupleWolfgang#7: we could partner them at this date of valentineAlt#35: :DAlt#35: I wish! And I accept!
We were talking about his two alts whom I rejected, because they've been with his other lovers. I deemed them "unpure". Then we talked about my other alts.
He wanted to wake up Alt#27 but he didn't want to wake up his alt that was paired with her. That particular alt of his is male, and he didn't want to do MF. Instead, he wanted to created a new (female) alt to be with #27. I declined. #27 belongs with that specific alt, and I couldn't see her waking up while her lover remains hibernating. So, instead, I introduced him to #35.
He had mixed feelings.
A screenshot of my horoscope for today. © AstrologyZone Susan Miller |
When he met her, Wolfgang said that, in a sense, she was our daughter, taking a hint from something I wrote in her profile. Plus, I explained that her name came from a poem that he wrote for me. He was very glad to meet her; however, the reason for her existence bothered him.
I was surprised when he created his own alt to be with and to be like Alt#35. They would be another pair that are exclusive only to us, to our "inner circle". Pure.
Today was the first day those alts "met" and spent time together. About fifteen minutes before I had to leave to get ready for work, he had a little thought. So, we quickly wrestled with the partnering process.
By the time I hopped in the shower, they had each other's names in their profiles. My fourth SL partnership; two with him.
I also agreed to go back and partner Alt#27 with her lover, a partnership that I declined angrily in the past. But we would do that next month on the fifth anniversary of our very first meeting in 2012, so it would be a significant day for us. Then, I would have a total of five partnerships, three with him.
No comments:
Post a Comment